Wednesday, October 16, 2002
According to a report from law.com, the oral argument in Syngenta v. Henson went so poorly for the defendant-petitioner, that the plaintiff-respondent hardly even bothered to argue (using only 10 of his allowed 30 minutes). Looks like defendants won't be able to use the All Writs Act as a basis for removal any more. See my earlier post here to see what I'm talking about, if you're not a removal jurisdiction afficionado.
posted by sam 6:37 AM 
0 comments
0 Comments:
|
email: first name@last name dot net
|
(The Return of) Ignatz, by Sam Heldman